[tw] : Re: Clark's URL

“Re: Clark's URL”
From:	Philippe Martin	In Response To:	1487 Clark's URL
Date Posted:	Saturday, January 19, 2002 11:17:41 AM	Replies:	3

Enclosures:	None.

At 18:28 -0500 18/01/02, Seth wrote:

>Keep plugging away with Conversant, Clark! It won't be long before you'll be surprising yourself with what you're able to do.

And you know what? From the admin's point of view, the simplicity that makes Radio/Manila so cools when you begins with them, is exactly what you hate after a while. :-)

After a couple years working on Conversant, I now have to work with Manila all the time (because the system I work on was created on Manila before I was hired). I can tell you that I miss Conversant! The simplest things in Conversant are just impossible or almost in Manila. Try using a Javascript in a specific page, for exemple... or a different template...

Just my two (Euro) cents.

Flip
--

______________________________________________________________________
Philippe MARTIN (a.k.a. Flip) mailto:flip@macrobyte.net
http://www.MacrobyteResources.com http://www.Free-Conversant.com

Discussion Thread:

RE: Conversant & Flip (by Seth Dillingham at 1/19/2002)

On 1/19/2002 at 10:17 AM, Philippe Martin wrote: >And you know what? From the admin's point of view,
- RE: Conversant & Flip (by Philippe Martin at 1/19/2002)
  
  At 10:38 -0500 19/01/02, Seth Dillingham wrote: >That's the scalability factor, but rather than server-load
Re: Clark's URL (by Clark Venable at 1/19/2002)

Oh, I'm sure that's the case. For example, there's some content that I don't even want people outside
- Re: Clark's URL (by Jim Roepcke at 1/19/2002)
  
  On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 07:39 AM, Clark Venable wrote: > Oh, I'm sure that's the case.
  - RE: Clark's URL (by Seth Dillingham at 1/19/2002)
    
    On 1/19/2002 at 1:47 PM, Jim Roepcke wrote: >That's why I'm using Conversant. I'm not using all the
    - RE: Clark's URL (by Mark Morgan at 1/19/2002)
      
      hassle. hassle. hassle.
    - Re: Clark's URL (by Jim Roepcke at 1/19/2002)
      
      / /----- /----- +----- / +------+ +----+ ----- \----- +-- / \-----/ -----/ +---- +----- On
      - Re: Clark's URL (by Jim Roepcke at 1/19/2002)
        
        BUG! It munched my backslahes! Jim
        
        Re: Clark's URL (by Jim Roepcke at 1/19/2002)
        
        msgBody = msgBody.replace("backslahes", "backslashes"); Jim
  - Re: Clark's URL (by Clark Venable at 1/19/2002)
    
    Jim, It's a small world. I'm going through your WebObjects book right now. So, my technology list of
Re: Clark's URL (by Bill Kearney at 1/19/2002)

An explanation, perhaps, is that Macrobyte is interested in the revenue that comes from satisfied customers.
- Re: Clark's URL (by Mark Morgan at 1/19/2002)
  
  Agreed. One of the reasons I moved to Conversant is the professionalism of the people involved. When
  - RE: Clark's URL (by Seth Dillingham at 1/19/2002)
    
    On 1/19/2002 at 1:05 PM, Mark Morgan wrote: >Seth wrote a very polite response. He was always very nice,
    - RE: Clark's URL (by Mark Morgan at 1/19/2002)
      
      http://www.voicesofunreason.com/fullthread$75#VU75 for those of you playing the home game.
  - Re: Clark's URL (by Bill Kearney at 1/19/2002)
    
    > Agreed. One of the reasons I moved to Conversant is the professionalism of the people involved. >
    - Re: Clark's URL (by Mark Morgan at 1/19/2002)
      
      Now, having finally gotten completely offtopic, I'll finish by saying I think the real reason Seth is
      - Re: Clark's URL (by Mark Morgan at 1/19/2002)
        
        Addendum: and Bill, you should at least try Conversant. Good grief man, it's free! Even I can afford
        
        RE: Clark's URL (by Seth Dillingham at 1/19/2002)
        
        On 1/19/2002 at 2:46 PM, Mark Morgan wrote: >Addendum: and Bill, you should at least try Conversant.
        
        RE: Clark's URL (by Corinne Dillingham at 1/19/2002)
        
        On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 14:54:43 -0500, Seth Dillingham wrote: >Unless he's so po' he can't even pay
        
        Re: Clark's URL (by Bill Kearney at 1/20/2002)
        
        I've tried it and I think it's great. I don't use it now mainly because I don't want yet another ting
    - RE: Clark's URL (by Seth Dillingham at 1/19/2002)
      
      On 1/19/2002 at 2:31 PM, Bill Kearney wrote: >Seth does an *excellent* job of handling requests. I've

Trackbacks:

There are no trackbacks.

Search TruerWords

“Re: Clark's URL”