On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 07:39 AM, Clark Venable wrote:
> Oh, I'm sure that's the case.
>
> For example, there's some content that I don't even want people outside
> my
> organization to see. I was looking for a NetCloak-like functionality in
> Manila but it's just not there. In Conversant, it should be easy.
That's why I'm using Conversant. I'm not using all the features of it,
not even close. But I know that if I want to add some new
functionality, there's an excellent chance it's already built in or
derivable from the existing building blocks... meaning I don't have to
raise the foundation of my site just for little upgrades. And just
about everything people request on the support site is implemented very
soon after.
My site was on Manila from October 1999 until March 2000. I'm glad I
moved, Manila has barely improved (IMHO) whereas Conversant today blows
Conversant of March 2000 out of the water, and it was better than Manila
even then.
I can't wait for the new weblog plugin. :-)
Jim
--
Jim Roepcke
Roepcke Computing Solutions
Personal site:
http://jim.roepcke.com/
Co-Author, Professional WebObjects 5.0 with Java
http://jim.roepcke.com/r/WebObjectsBook
