[tw] : RE: The "Value" of My RSD Approach...

“RE: The "Value" of My RSD Approach...”
From:	Brent Simmons	In Response To:	2621 RE: The "Value" of My RSD Approach...
Date Posted:	Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:10:23 PM	Replies:	1

Enclosures:	None.

The only possible nit I'm seeing with the latest XML example on Daniel's page now is that in some cases blogID is an attribute of the API and other times it's in the settings section.

I'm thinking it should be in one place or the other, it shouldn't be allowed in two places.

Otherwise -- yes, it looks like it's very close to soup.

Discussion Thread:

RE: The "Value" of My RSD Approach... (by Seth Dillingham at 11/21/2002)

On 11/21/02, Brent Simmons said: >The only possible nit I'm seeing with the latest XML example on > Daniel's
- RE: The "Value" of My RSD Approach... (by Brent Simmons at 11/21/2002)
  
  >The same goes for all of the attributes/elements: one or the other. No need for that kind of flexibility,
  - RE: The "Value" of My RSD Approach... (by Daniel Berlinger at 11/21/2002)
    
    Allrighty, blogID is an attribute. Should all the attributes be required? Maybe blogID should be optional?
  - RE: The "Value" of My RSD Approach... (by Daniel Berlinger at 11/21/2002)
    
    Allrighty, blogID is an attribute. Should all the attributes be required? Maybe blogID should be optional?
  - RE: The "Value" of My RSD Approach... (by Daniel Berlinger at 11/21/2002)
    
    Allrighty, blogID is an attribute. Should all the attributes be required? Maybe blogID should be optional?

Trackbacks:

There are no trackbacks.

Search TruerWords

“RE: The "Value" of My RSD Approach...”