[tw] : Updated the string-wrapping functions

“Updated the string-wrapping functions”
From:	Seth Dillingham	In Response To:	5417 Replacement for Frontier's string.wrap function
Date Posted:	Tuesday, March 21, 2006 4:07:27 PM	Replies:	1

Enclosures:	None.

I'll keep this one short: I've updated both of the usertalk-based string wrapping functions today. Thomas Creedon found a bug which affected both versions, so I had to update them both.

If no more bugs are found, then these are the versions which I'll based the kernel code on in a couple of weeks.

(Oh, they're here: future replacement for string.wrap and the brand new string.wrapQuoted.)

Update: Grr. Fixed the link.

Discussion Thread:

Re: Updated the string-wrapping functions (by Duncan Smeed at 3/21/2006)

>I'll keep this one short: I've updated both of the usertalk-based >string wrapping functions today.
- RE: Updated the string-wrapping functions (by Seth Dillingham at 3/21/2006)
  
  On 3/21/06, Duncan Smeed said: >Not sure if the following is a bug or a feature but I note that BBEdit
  - RE: Updated the string-wrapping functions (by Duncan Smeed at 3/21/2006)
    
    On 21-3-06 18:40, Seth Dillingham wrote: > >On 3/21/06, Duncan Smeed said: > >>Not sure if the following
    - RE: Updated the string-wrapping functions (by Seth Dillingham at 3/21/2006)
      
      On 3/21/06, Duncan Smeed said: >Barebones must have had their reasons. It could easily be an off-by-one

Trackbacks:

There are no trackbacks.

Search TruerWords

“Updated the string-wrapping functions”