TruerWords Logo
Google
 
Web www.truerwords.net

Search TruerWords

Welcome
Sign Up  Log On

Topic: Computers Suck

Messages: (9) 1


Author: Seth Dillingham

Date:8/10/2000

Permalink Icon

# 236

Computers Suck

Jim Roepcke reminded me today that Computers Suck, and Operating Systems suck, and that they're both much easier to work with if you remember that (this was part of a broader conversation, trust me).

However, in my opinion:

Nothing sucks on a computer as much as email clients.

They suck infinitely.

I've never seen or used an email client with more than "great potential". They always disappoint, and those with the most potential (like MailSmith, from BareBones) end up discontinued (sometimes unofficially) before the potential is realized. Why? Probably because the lowest-common-denominator free app, Outlook Express, has killed the market.

(Update: thankfully, I was wrong about MailSmith, it wasn't discontinued. BareBones just went a long time without updating it.)

[Top]


Author: "Greg Pierce"

Date:8/10/2000

Permalink Icon

# 237

RE: Computers Suck

> Nothing sucks on a computer as much as email clients.
>
> They suck infinitely.

I've felt that way for a long time as well.

I've got to admit, however, that I was getting to like Outlook Express 5.0 /
Mac pretty well. It has a very usable interface, good management of
multiple accounts, good spell checking on the fly (if you have Office
installed)...and didn't overwhelm me with a million open windows ( my main
beef w/ Eudora/Mac that made me switch ).

I'm in Windows more lately, and am using Outlook 2000. I do hate it at the
moment as an e-mail client...but really dig the built in PIM functions.
I've tried a bunch of PIMs on the Mac, and always have trouble with synching
up notes and to-dos with contacts and my calendar...I'm finding Outlook/Win
very usable in this fashion. Just drop an e-mail on the task or event to
keep history, etc...perhaps "Entourage" in Office 2001/Mac will be similar.

The thing that has always ended up killing any good things I find in an
e-mail app is the data handling, however. I get _tons_ of e-mail. All
things being equal, I would keep all of it...but none of the e-mails tools
I've used can handle it. They all start to barf dealing with thousands of
messages. That's what I don't really get...why would you build a tool like
an e-mail app w/o a good embedding db engine!

g.

[Top]


Author: Philippe Martin

Date:8/10/2000

Permalink Icon

# 239

RE: Computers Suck

The thing that has always ended up killing any good things I find in an e-mail app is the data handling, however. I get _tons_ of e-mail. All things being equal, I would keep all of it...but none of the e-mails tools I've used can handle it. They all start to barf dealing with thousands of messages.

I have at least 70 mailboxes and some of them are around 40 MB (that makes tens of thousands of messages). Eudora handles that happily with only 5 MB of ram (no, I don't work for Qualcomm). :-)

Flip

[Top]


Author: Seth Dillingham

Date:8/10/2000

Permalink Icon

# 242

RE: Computers Suck

On Thursday, August 10, 2000 at 9:26 PM, Philippe Martin (flip@macrobyte.net) wrote:

>I have at least 20 mailboxes and some of them are around 40 MB (that makes
>tens of thousands of messages). Eudora handles that happily with only 5 MB
>of ram (no, I don't work for Qualcomm). :-)

If Eudora had a single-window interface like Emailer, MailSmith, Outlook Express, and Netscape Communicator, then I'd switch to it.

Seth

[Top]


Author: Seth Dillingham

Date:8/10/2000

Permalink Icon

# 240

RE: Computers Suck

On Thursday, August 10, 2000 at 9:08 PM, Greg Pierce (greg@turtleprod.com) wrote:

>I've got to admit, however, that I was getting to like Outlook Express 5.0 /
>Mac pretty well. It has a very usable interface, good management of
>multiple accounts, good spell checking on the fly (if you have Office
>installed)...and didn't overwhelm me with a million open windows ( my main
>beef w/ Eudora/Mac that made me switch ).

I dislike the filtering in OE5/Mac. I absolutely love the filtering in MailSmith, but it's a little bit buggy and slow... which is where they left it. :-(

I also hated Claris Emailer less than any other email client on the mac, when it was still a "live" email client.

It's made a cynic out of me, in this regard. As long as I'm going to hate my email client, and I've been burned by paying for two eventually-killed email clients that I hated less than the others, I should just stick with the free one.

Unfortunately, I don't hate the free one less than the others. :-(

>The thing that has always ended up killing any good things I find in an
>e-mail app is the data handling, however. I get _tons_ of e-mail. All
>things being equal, I would keep all of it...but none of the e-mails tools
>I've used can handle it. They all start to barf dealing with thousands of
>messages. That's what I don't really get...why would you build a tool like
>an e-mail app w/o a good embedding db engine!

Yes, I've had this discussion with Brian Andresen and Jim Roepcke before. It's definitely the thing I don't understand about mail clients... there are a lot of people out there getting as much mail as I do... why doesn't someone make a mail client to handle our excessive email volume?

MailSmith starts to choke at about 17,000 - 18,000 messages, which is really just a few months worth of messages from all of the lists I'm on.

Seth

Seth Dillingham seth@macrobyte.net
President, Macrobyte Resources (860) 572-0244
========================================================================
76 Dogwood Lane http://www.MacrobyteResources.com/
Mystic, CT 06355

[Top]


Author: Sean McMains

Date:8/10/2000

Permalink Icon

# 247

Re: Computers Suck

I dislike the filtering in OE5/Mac. I absolutely love the filtering in MailSmith, but it's a little bit buggy and slow... which is where they left it. :-(

What about the filtering do you dislike? I'm using it for several funky filtering functions, and it treats me well, aside from being a wee bit slower than I'd like. My favorite feature is that you can trigger Applescripts as a function of the filter rules, which gives you a phenomenal amount of flexibility.

Sean

[Top]


Author: Philippe Martin

Date:8/10/2000

Permalink Icon

# 238

RE: Computers Suck

Nothing sucks on a computer as much as email clients.

Not sure what you ask to your email client, Seth, but I'm very pleased with Eudora. :-)

It works fine with multiple personalities, has great filter features (I've got at least 90% of spam filtered out), it's fast, it checks your spelling as you type, and you can even use it for free (if you accept to see a little window displaying ads, à la AIM).

I'm using the 5.0 beta 10, at the moment, but the 4.2.3 has 90% of its features.

Flip

[Top]


Author: Seth Dillingham

Date:6/22/2001

Permalink Icon

# 780

Email Clients: MailSmith and Mail.app

I've mentioned this before, but today Greg Pierce reminded me that email software sucks. He mentioned to me that he was starting to like Mail.app from Apple. I asked him if he'd mind writing up his thoughts about it, and I guess that well written mini-review is the result. Nifty!

I discussed the subject of "Email Clients Suck" for the hundredth time yesterday with Brian Andresen. We're both picky about our email software. It's something we use all day, almost every day. We use it more than the browser, and we both receive hundreds of messages per day.

Clients that have nice interfaces can't handle huge volumes of email in their databases. Clients that can handle my volume of email have annoying - or downright painful - interfaces. There are some clients that fall somewhere in between, but those are usually either weak in both categories, or lack some very important secondary features like powerful filtering or fast searching.

My current software is MailSmith, from BareBones Software. At one point I thought it had been quietly discontinued, because I'm one of their beta testers and it had been a very long time since the last beta release. Thankfully, that turned out to be untrue. I like MailSmith more than anything else I've used since the long-dead Claris Emailer.

It's weird, isn't it? All these companies spending all this money to develop software for a small percentage of the marketplace, but nobody can develop an absolute killer product for 100% of the marketplace - email is ubiquitous, after all - because Microsoft released their software for free.

I'd pay good money for a killer email package.

[Top]


Author: Jim Roepcke

Date:6/22/2001

Permalink Icon

# 781

RE: Email Clients: MailSmith and Mail.app

Me too. I hate how bad email is now that there's no money in it.

And unfortunately, Mail.app gets really flaky when you have over 50 mailing lists blasting it with over 500 messages a day.

At least, it does for me. I have to force quit it a few times a day. It doesn't look like it loses any data, but, I could be wrong.

Until I can get a really really good email client for OS X I'll stick with Mail.app because it's a Cocoa app, and that means lots of nice things just work -- like Services, the scroll wheel on my mouse, real-time spell checking, scroll-bar "scroll to here", etc etc.

Jim

[Top]



<- Previous Thread:
Better Code, Better Programmers

Next Thread: ->
RE: Computers Suck

Until August 31
My Amazon sales
benefit the PMC

Homepage Links

Apr 1 - Aug 31
Ad revenue
benefits the PMC


TruerWords
is Seth Dillingham's
personal web site.
Read'em and weep, baby.